Global Empire Corporation
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 1998 | Best For: Healthcare, finance, customer support, back office
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Intelemark
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 1999 | Best For: B2B appointment setting & lead generation
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Call Motivated Sellers
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2015 | Best For: Real estate outbound calling
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Customer Communications Corp
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2008 | Best For: Scalable omnichannel customer support
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Compare outsourcing against staffing before you commit.
We can map the seat count, hiring calendar, and replacement plan that fits your call center.
Call Center Staffing
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2003 | Best For: Rapid agent deployment & seasonal scaling
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
B2B Appointment Setting
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2012 | Best For: SMB outbound sales & pipeline growth
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Contact Center USA
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 1999 | Best For: US-based call center services
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Call Center Communications
Headquarters: Canada | Founded: 2005 | Best For: Large-scale enterprise BPO
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Business Process Outsourcing
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2010 | Best For: Global CX & digital customer engagement
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Canada Contact Centre
Headquarters: Canada | Founded: 2004 | Best For: Enterprise process transformation
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
B2B Telemarketing
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2008 | Best For: IT + BPO hybrid outsourcing
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Telemarketing Services
Headquarters: Canada | Founded: 2010 | Best For: AI-driven process automation
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Appointment Setting
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2012 | Best For: Digital-first outsourcing
Part of our group of companies.
Services:
Teleperformance
Headquarters: France | Founded: 1978 | Best For: Telecom & IT-enabled services
Independent — not part of our group. Included because no useful provider list can omit it.
Services:
Concentrix
Headquarters: United States | Founded: 2004 | Best For: BPO & digital CX
Independent — not part of our group. Included because no useful provider list can omit it.
Services:
Industries served by our group

- Global Empire Corporation: Healthcare providers, insurance firms, financial services, SMBs & mid-market
- Intelemark: SaaS, technology, manufacturing, professional services
- Call Motivated Sellers: Real estate investing, wholesaling, acquisitions
- Customer Communications Corp: Retail, ecommerce, healthcare, service-based businesses
- Call Center Staffing: Retail, ecommerce, customer support teams
- B2B Appointment Setting: Small and mid-sized B2B companies
- Contact Center USA: Real estate investors, wholesalers, acquisition teams
- Call Center Communications: Fortune 500, telecom, banking, healthcare, retail
- Business Process Outsourcing: Retail, finance, healthcare, technology
- Canada Contact Centre: Global enterprises across finance, supply chain, HR
- B2B Telemarketing: Telecom, travel, retail, financial services
- Telemarketing Services: Finance & accounting, healthcare, procurement
- Appointment Setting: Healthcare, BFSI, manufacturing
- Teleperformance (independent): Telecom providers, enterprises, IT services
- Concentrix (independent): Healthcare, insurance, fintech, airlines
A search for the best call center outsourcing companies usually ends on a ranked list. A list is a fine place to collect names, but it cannot tell you which provider fits your call volume, your hours, or the way your calls actually arrive. Voice is the least forgiving channel to outsource. A call that is not answered in the moment is a customer on hold, and no amount of reporting fixes that afterward.
This guide does not rank providers. It explains the types of company that sell voice outsourcing, how to cut a long list down to three or four, what to test before you sign, and the warning signs that show up in proposals. For named providers, start with /blog/top-15-bpo-companies-in-the-world and the country lists linked at the end of this page. One disclosure first: we are a staffing and recruiting agency, not an outsourcer, so we have an interest in the final section. The evaluation method applies whichever model you choose.
Why voice is the hardest channel to hand over
Email and tickets wait in a queue until someone gets to them. Phone calls do not. Every call arrives at a moment the customer chose, and the provider either has a trained agent free in that interval or it does not. That single fact shapes everything about a voice program. Staffing is planned by the half hour, not by the day, and a plan that is right on average can still be wrong at ten on a Monday morning.
It also means voice outsourcing is an operations purchase, not a headcount purchase. You are buying forecasting, scheduling, real-time queue management, telephony uptime, call quality monitoring and floor supervision, with agents as the visible part. A provider can have pleasant, capable agents and still fail you because the people planning the schedule are weak. In our experience, disappointment in voice programs traces back to that gap more often than to the agents themselves.
So judge providers on how they run a queue. The sections below are ordered with that in mind.
The five kinds of provider you will meet
Almost every company that turns up in a search falls into one of five types. Knowing the type tells you more about fit than the brand name does.
- Large global BPO: Multi-country delivery, mature workforce management, deep compliance and security functions, and the ability to absorb hundreds of seats. The trade-off is attention. Smaller programs tend to get a standard operating model, junior account management and long change-request cycles.
- Mid-market specialist: A provider focused on one or a few industries or call types, such as healthcare scheduling, insurance claims intake or technical support. You get supervisors who know your call types and leadership you can actually reach. Check how much capacity they have beyond their current sites before you plan on growth.
- Nearshore boutique: A smaller operator, typically in Latin America or the Caribbean for US buyers, selling time-zone alignment and bilingual English and Spanish coverage. Strong for daytime voice with a cultural fit to US callers. Depth of workforce management and overnight coverage vary widely, so test them and do not assume.
- Staffing or agent-placement model: A recruiting partner sources and screens agents, supervisors, QA and workforce management staff who work inside your operation, on your telephony, under your management. You keep control of process and quality. You also keep the work of running the floor, which is why this only fits if you already have one.
- Freelance marketplace: Individual contractors hired by the hour through a platform. Workable for a very small business that needs a few hours of phone cover. There is no shared queue management, no supervision, no backup when someone is sick, and usually no controlled environment for sensitive data.
These types overlap at the edges. Some mid-market providers run nearshore sites, and some large BPOs have a division for smaller accounts. Ask each company which description it would choose for itself and which programs it turns away. A provider that claims to be right for every size and every call type has told you nothing.
Build the shortlist from your call profile
Before you contact anyone, write one page that describes the work. Providers give sharper answers when the brief is specific, and you will be able to discard poor fits without sitting through a presentation.
- Volume and shape: Calls per week, the busiest days and hours, and how much the pattern moves by season or campaign.
- Direction: Inbound service, inbound sales, outbound sales, outbound service such as reminders or collections, or a mix.
- Hours: Business day only, extended evenings, weekends, or full 24/7 coverage.
- Languages: Which ones, and whether they are needed at all hours or only at peak.
- Call complexity: Typical call length, the number of systems an agent touches, and how long a new agent takes to become competent.
- Data sensitivity: Whether agents handle payment cards, health information or account authentication.
- Control: Whether you expect to listen to calls, attend calibrations and approve script changes, or want to hand the operation over and review results.
Now match the profile to the types. A small, business-hours inbound program is usually a poor fit for a large global BPO and a good fit for a mid-market specialist or a nearshore boutique. Overnight and weekend coverage pushes you toward providers with offshore or multi-site delivery. Regulated calls narrow the field to providers that can show you their controls, not describe them. If you want daily control and already have supervisors, the staffing model belongs on the list next to the outsourcers.
Aim for three or four names. More than that and the evaluation itself becomes the project.
Test workforce management before anything else
Workforce management, usually shortened to WFM, is the function that forecasts call volume, works out how many agents are needed in each interval, builds schedules and adjusts the plan during the day. It is the clearest sign of maturity in a voice provider, and the one buyers most often skip because it is less visible than the agents.
Give each shortlisted provider a few weeks of your real interval data, or a realistic sample, and ask them to come back with a staffing plan. The response shows you:
- Whether they forecast by interval or simply divide weekly volume by agent capacity. The second approach produces a plan that looks fine on paper and fails at peak.
- How they treat shrinkage: breaks, training, coaching, absence and system downtime. A plan with no shrinkage assumption will be understaffed from the first day.
- What occupancy they plan to run agents at, and what they say happens to quality and attrition when it runs too high for too long.
- Who manages the queue in real time, what authority that person has to move agents or approve overtime, and during which hours they are present.
- How schedule adherence is tracked and what happens when it slips.
- What they do when actual volume departs from forecast, in either direction, and how quickly you hear about it.
A mature provider will ask questions back about marketing calendars, billing cycles and outage history. A weak one will return a seat count. If you want the mechanics behind these terms, /blog/occupancy-shrinkage-headcount walks through how occupancy and shrinkage turn into headcount.
Also ask whether your program gets dedicated agents or a shared pool. Shared agents handle several clients and can be efficient for low, unpredictable volume. Dedicated agents learn your product in depth. Neither is wrong, but the proposal should say which one you are buying, and it should not change without your agreement.
Telephony: decide who owns the platform
Calls can run on the provider's phone platform or on yours. On the provider's platform, launch is faster and they carry the uptime responsibility, but your call routing, recordings and reporting live in a system you do not control. On your platform, the provider's agents log in to your contact center software, you keep the data and the routing logic, and changing providers later is much less painful.
These points settle the telephony picture:
- Who owns the phone numbers, and how they are returned or ported if the contract ends.
- How the IVR menu and routing rules are changed, by whom, and how long a change takes.
- Where call recordings are stored, for how long, who can access them, and whether you receive them at exit.
- What happens to calls if a site loses power or connectivity, and whether failover has been used in a real event.
- Whether agents work on site, from home or both, and what the network and headset standards are for home agents.
- How card details are kept out of recordings and away from agent screens if you take payments by phone. PCI DSS governs cardholder data, so ask for evidence of how the provider meets it for voice, not a general assurance.
Ask to hear call audio from a live program, not a demo line. Delay, echo and clipped words are hard to fix after launch, and customers notice them at once.
Inbound and outbound need different strengths
Many providers sell both and are good at one. Inbound is a discipline of availability: service level, abandonment, handle time, first-call resolution and transfer rate. The provider's skill lies in having the right number of trained people free at the right moment and resolving the call without a callback.
Outbound is a discipline of contact strategy and compliance: list quality, dialing mode, attempt rules, calling windows, contact rate, conversion and complaint handling. In the United States, the TCPA covers autodialed and prerecorded calls and texts and the consent they require. An outbound provider should be able to explain how consent is captured and stored, how do-not-call requests are honored and how the dialer is configured for your campaign. Confirm the specifics for your program with counsel before launch.
If your program runs mostly in one direction, ask how much of the provider's current work runs in that direction, and ask to speak to a reference with the same kind of campaign. If you need both, ask whether the same agents will do both. Blended agents can smooth out idle time, but switching between a service mindset and a sales mindset in the middle of a shift is hard, and results usually suffer on whichever side is measured less closely.
Run a pilot that is able to fail
A pilot only tells you something if it is set up so that a weak provider would visibly struggle. Keep it small, keep it real, and agree on the measures before it starts.

- Use live calls from a defined queue or call type, not an easy segment chosen for the occasion.
- Agree on the service level target, the quality scoring method and the reporting schedule in writing before the first call.
- Score a sample of pilot calls yourself on your own quality form, then compare your scores with theirs in a calibration session. The size of the gap matters more than either score.
- Meet the supervisors and the real-time analyst who will run your program, not only the sales team.
- Watch what happens in a bad interval. A queue spike during the pilot is useful, because you see how fast they react and how honestly they report it.
- Count how many pilot agents are still on the program at the end, and ask what happened to those who left.
Pay attention to how training is handled. A provider that asks for your call recordings, builds a nesting period with close supervision and tests agents before they take live calls is showing you how it will behave at full scale.
Red flags in a voice proposal
- A seat count with no interval staffing plan behind it.
- No mention of shrinkage, occupancy or schedule adherence anywhere in the document.
- Attrition described only as an annual figure. Early-tenure loss is what disrupts a program, and an annual figure hides it.
- Supervisors and quality analysts shared across several clients without saying so.
- Unwillingness to let you listen to live or recorded calls from the pilot.
- Delivery location described as a region, not a named site, or a clause allowing work to move between sites without your consent.
- References that are all much larger or much smaller than your program.
- A long initial term with no performance-based exit.
- Every answer in the meeting comes from sales, and operations leaders appear only after signature.
None of these proves a provider is bad. Each one is a reason to slow down and ask for the missing detail in writing.
When you need agents, not an outsourcing company
Some buyers reach the end of this process and realize that nothing is wrong with how their operation runs. The scripts work, the supervisors are good, quality monitoring is in place and the telephony is theirs. What is missing is people. Recruiting cannot fill classes fast enough, or attrition keeps reopening the same seats. Handing that operation to an outsourcer replaces a working management layer with someone else's in order to solve a hiring problem.
That is the case for the staffing model. A recruiting partner sources and screens agents, and where needed supervisors, QA analysts and workforce management staff, who then work inside your operation on your systems. We have done this for about 20 years across onshore, nearshore and offshore markets. /services/call-center-recruitment explains the model and /locations shows the regions covered.
Staffing is the wrong choice if you have no floor leadership, no quality process or no wish to run a call center at all. In that situation a managed outsourcer is the better answer, and the evaluation above is how to choose one. If you are undecided between the two, /blog/in-house-vs-outsourced-call-center compares the operating models side by side.
Once the shortlist exists, /blog/inbound-call-center-outsourcing and /blog/outbound-call-center-outsourcing go deeper on what to test for each program type.





